Name: Randall Aiken E-Mail: reaiken@aikenamps.com Date: 1/12/100 6:40 PM Subject: Re: Adding resistor across pot to change taper (revisited) That circuit was not new even 20 years ago! It has been around since the dinosaurs played tube amps. I suspect Mr. Dumble stole it from one of Fender's schematics, who probably stole it from a tube manual or textbook. It is nothing more than the standard single-stage, inverting feedback amplifier. If you read the paper on my website entitled "Designing single-stage inverting feedback amplifiers", you will find the equations needed to calculate the gain and response, the effect of the coupling capacitor, and the reasons for the filtering effect. The open-loop gain is controlled by the tube, the 100k plate load resistor, and the partially-bypassed cathode. The partially-bypassed cathode reduces the normal gain of -63 or so down to -36, not a good thing for a feedback amp, which depends on excess loop gain to work properly. The series resistor shapes the response to get it more or less flat at the lower open-loop gain, although it still has some droop on the low end. This partial bypassing also raises the effective open-loop output impedance from 38.5K to around 60K. It does help the transient response to not have a long time constant on the cathode, though, at the expense of loop gain and output impedance. The feedback resistor, Rf, is either 22M or 32M, depending on the switch setting. The input resistor, Ri, varies all over the place, depending on the setting of the volume pot (even more so with the 1M taper-modifying resistor). Ignoring the 38.5K output impedance of the first stage (because it is low in relation to the resistances in the gain control), and assuming the input signal is the signal at the top of the pot, if the pot is at zero, Ri is 100K. If the pot is at max, Ri is 1M in parallel with 500K, plus 100K, or 433K. At midpoint, Ri is (1M + 500K) in parallel with (500K in parallel with 1M) plus 100K, or 373K. As you can see, the effective input resistor value varies from 100k to 433K, depending on the pot setting. Using the equations shown in the paper, the gain of the stage (from top of volume pot to output before coupling cap) varies from -30/-32 (for 22M/32M) at zero pot setting to -22/-25 at midpoint, to -21/-24 at max. Note that the effective attenuation of the input signal also changes as the pot is varied, as does the effective input impedance. As the gain is increased with the pot, the gain of the amp is decreased, effectively creating yet another modified taper. This is why the taper doesn't feel like a "normal" audio-taper volume pot. The lower-3dB frequency response is controlled primarily by the 0.022uF input coupling cap. The lower-3dB point varies from 0.6Hz to 3.6Hz, depending on the setting of the pot. Either way, it is plenty low enough, possibly too low, considering the potential transient response problems these feedback amps have. You could probably go as low as 0.01uF without affecting the low end too much. Remember, the -1dB point is a full octave away from the -3dB point, and you will still see some attenation a full decade away, so for flat response at 80Hz, this can be designed for a 8Hz cutoff. The .047uF feedback coupling cap is way too large for the resistor values, giving a -3dB response of 0.15Hz, which is not good for low-frequency transient response. This cap should be around 1500pF for the feedback resistor values used. The feedback loop will take out any changes in frequency response, so changing this cap value from .047uF to 1500pF is not as drastic as it sounds. It will only improve the transient response. The transient response problems show up as a "bounce", or slowly decaying shift of the waveform average DC level at the plate when a large transient input signal is present. It can cause an audible distortion, even if it doesn't result in clipping at the plate, due to the change in operating point. The upper -3dB frequency response point is set by the stray capacitance across the 22M/32M resistor, in addition to the rolloff due to the finite gain/bandwidth product of the amplifier. As shown, assuming no stray capacitance, the response out of the first stage is around 40kHz at the -3dB point. The response out of the second stage is around 8.5kHz at the -3dB point with a 22M resistor and 7.2kHz at the -3dB point with a 32M resistor (with the pot at max). The 560pF/470k network following the amp peaks it back up so the -3dB point is around 28kHz with the 32M resistor, but in doing so, creates a +7dB peak at around 3.4kHz. A large input capacitance of a following stage would reduce this a bit. However, even a small stray capacitance across the large value feedback resistors will effectively cut the frequency response way down. Randall Aiken